Off the Wagon in the Granite State
My interest in the Iowa caucuses stems from having lived there for most of two decades. I take mild offense at all the inbred-pig-farmer jokes made by people dissing the caucuses, although many of those same jokers are spot-on about the blinding cultural whiteness of the place. I’ve been to New Hampshire once in my life, for as long as it takes to travel I-95 on the way to Maine. I know less about it, and I care less about its primary. But I was right on my Iowa predictions last week (and on all four NFL games over the weekend), so here I go back into the pool.
It doesn’t take a wizard to say that Barack Obama is going to win on the Democratic side. I stopped paying much attention a few weeks ago to the slow-motion trainwreck that is the GOP field, so I was shocked to learn over the weekend that John McCain is leading in the latest polling. OK, I’ll take him. What’s more interesting is what happens further down, so let’s throw the following against the wall and see what sticks.
I think Hillary’s presumed implosion is being exaggerated. After tomorrow, only 38 delegates will have been selected, and it will take over 2,000 to win the nomination. This morning, Salon explained how she could win even if Obama takes New Hampshire by a landslide. Of course, a few hours later Pandagon chronicled the silly media coverage of her campaign appearances today. The media’s personal dislike of her and their sexist stereotypes regarding female candidates only increase the steepness of the hill she has to climb. (Similarly, the mighty Greenwald wrote how the media’s uncritical adoration of John McCain is fueling his ascent, and how John Edwards—who, if this campaign were a rational thing would be the leading contender—can’t get them to notice him.) Hillary should finish second, Edwards third.
On the Repug side, New Hampshire was supposed to be where America’s Mayor of 9/11 was going to strut. Or maybe it was supposed to be where Multiple Choice Mitt sealed the deal after buying a win in Iowa. Instead, it’s where one of them is going to be on life-support after it’s over. New Hampshire wouldn’t be a place where Huckleberry would do well, even if he were handing out free donuts, so he lives to preach another day. TV’s Fred will pull about what he pulled in Iowa, because at any given moment there’s a fixed percentage of the population that’s clueless. I’d like to see Ron Paul finish in the top three just to spite Fox News, but he probably won’t. My main prediction for New Hampshire is, I guess, more chaos for the GOP. And that couldn’t happen to a more deserving bunch of people.
On a related matter, I recommend you read Lefty’s post on Obama as the man on the white horse, and consider his concerns about whether the Illinois senator is ready for prime time. I’ve shared these worries myself, and have resisted Obama’s charms because of them. (If I had to vote today, I’d be voting for Edwards, yet I continue to pine for Feingold.) But if Obama is going to be the nominee, I’m perfectly happy with him. He simply could not be worse for the country than the clown he would replace, even if the bad stuff Lefty mentions (suitcase nuke, Chinese dollar shenanigans, etc.) goes down. I think Obama is smart enough to know what he doesn’t know, and to surround himself with smart people. And if he can use his charisma to blunt the edges of the culture war, or to inspire people to public service like JFK did (and, yes, Reagan on the other side), so much the better. But before we get to see whether Obama can inspire the better angels of our nature, we’ll have to deal with the way he’s inspiring the worst in a way that’s utterly beyond his control. The Obama campaign has already unleashed the ugliest racial passions we’ve seen in many a year—and not just from the unhinged right, but from “mainstream” conservative commentators.
We sometimes think we’ve resolved our race problems in America, but just as there’s a difference between a dry drunk and a recovering alcoholic, there’s a difference between where we really are on race and where we need to be. And the Obama campaign, especially as it acquires an ever-brightening aura of success, is causing millions of our fellow citizens, many of whom would swear to know better, to fall off the wagon.
Posted: January 7th, 2008 under Democratic Debates, Dumbocrats, Edwards, GOP, GOP Debates, Hillary, McCain, Obama, Pigtards, Racism, Romney, Sir Rudy, The Primary Season, Thompson.
Comments: 9
Comments
Comment from Sasha
Time: January 8, 2008, 4:35 am
I too pine for Feingold but this country is no more ready for a Jew than for a woman or African-American.
Comment from Josh Hammond
Time: January 8, 2008, 8:18 am
I’d like to have Edwards defending me in court, but I wouldn’t him to be president for 30 seconds. He is a younger, slicker Ralph Nader. He was a bad choice for VP and we all know how well Darth Vader beat him up in their one debate. He is a guy who couldn’t get re-elected in his home state, asking voters in other states to vote for him.
And if he had his way with corporations, kiss your 401K goodby. Life is a little more complicated than us vs. them. And if I hear that he is the son of a mill worker one more time…
Comment from Leftcoast
Time: January 8, 2008, 12:52 pm
Agree with you completely on the role of race. As i mentioned in a previous comment, you can’t really poll for racism as people know it’s wrong and lie through their teeth. But it’s there, not only in the black hearts of the gun nuts itching to get a good shot at him, but in the privacy of the voting booth. Worse, what happens to Obama when Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton start chirping “our time has come.?” Will Obama have his Sister Soulja moment and distance himself from his brothers? Will he really be a candidate of all the people instead of a tool of black activists and a lightning rod for white supremacists? Stay tuned. It’s just beginning.
Comment from Josh Hammond
Time: January 8, 2008, 1:51 pm
Lefty, I’d give Obama a little more credit. He has managed so far with Al-the-Mouth-Sharpton on the sidelines. Jesse’s time has gone.
Comment from I.B.Lever
Time: January 8, 2008, 2:59 pm
There is one sure way of protecting Obama, let him make the Rev. Al Sharpton his Veep, no one in their right or left mind, would want to see him in “dah Wide Hout”.
Comment from Leftcoast
Time: January 8, 2008, 3:34 pm
He’s not the nominee yet, nor has he been embraced by the African American community yet. The minute Obama has a shot at real power, believe me, the atmospherics of his campaign are going to change and he is going to face some really hard choices. As much as I hate it, racism is still the unspoken critical dynamic in this country, even some 45 years past the civil rights act. That was Michael Moore’s conclusion at the end of Bowling for Columbine and his rationale for America’s obsession with guns. I tend to agree.
Comment from timr
Time: January 9, 2008, 9:58 am
JAB, kind of missed the results didn’t you? Along with all of the polls. I have said it before, Just how do you know if the people being polled are telling the truth? I saw a lot of surprise on the faces of everyone on MSNBC at about 1130PM CST last nite, everybody was wrong on this one. Remember something about counting chickens and eggs?
Comment from Shark
Time: January 9, 2008, 10:39 am
It is interesting that when Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson’s names get mentioned, they become a tune-out to many people. However, when Colin Powell’s name is mentioned, it brings some credibility to the issue and to the candidate. Sharpton and Jackson have never been elected to a position in public office, yet they speak as if they have political ambitions. Powell has never been elected either, but has a long record of public service by working for elected officials in various capacities. When Powell speaks, it seems more people listen to him than they do Sharpton and Jackson.
Comment from Sasha
Time: January 9, 2008, 12:24 pm
When Colin Powell’s name is mentioned I think “lying Republican” and tune out.









Write a comment