Best of the Bloggers

Jerry Bowles
J.A. Bartlett
Josh Hammond
Groom Lake
Sasha
Max von Schuler-Kobayashi
Blackdogred
John McCreery
Leftcoast

Google


Search WWW
Search www.bestoftheblogs.com

Archives

Site search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

RSS Blog Buzz

Meta

When Do We Say, “Enough?”

So…Iran stopped developing nucular weapons in 2003 as Fearless Leader warns us of an impending World War III. A couple of days ago, Rove tells us that it was the Dems that rushed that paragon of strategery into a war that he really didn’t want. And Rove sticks to his story despite the fact that insiders like Andy Card tell us that his claims are a crock.

Forget impeachment as a remedy. That will take too long and far too much spine for the Dems to even consider. But I continue to wonder why it is that the media gives these guys the imprimatur of legitimacy. They’re a freak show. After all it seems that they have less credibility than the homeless schizophrenic wandering the streets babbling about seeing Jesus pilot a UFO. Yes, I understand that Bush has the bully pulpit and warrants coverage and yes, 95% of the media is owned by five megacorps beholden the the current world order.

But seriously, there must be a tipping point where the need to maintain some semblance of credibility outweighs the slavish support of demonstrable liars. Certainly in the case of Rove, someone in the the media has to be thinking that next to Cheney, he’s the crazy uncle of the right. I certainly understand Rove’s “celebrity,” and am equally vexed that a dumb-as-shit 8-time loser consultant like Bob Shrum is propped up as an expert seven days a week on any network that will have him. But given Rove’s duplicity, the rational response would be to not give him any more coverage than they would the babbling maniac on the street. After all, what’s Rove without the media? Just another crazy Texan.

This isn’t a call for partisan vitriol as much as it is a plea for sanity. If we wonder why a majority of Americans are so pissed off at “the system” that they choose not to vote in elections, look no further than the media’s celebrity/ratings-at-all-cost approach to news. I know America’s smarter than this. We know we’re being had and can’t seem to do anything about it. This is why Obama is passing Hillary. Obama seems less contrived and conniving than Hillary, who, rightly or wrongly, has become positioned as the queen of calculation. We want it straight, which is why America bought the bullshit from that two-bit pretender in 2000.

Until we get it straight from the media, we going to continue to be assaulted by petty con artists and captivated by glib sound bites (Huckabee is getting wise to this and starting to climb). Until there is real media reform, until the fairness doctrine is reinstated, the propaganda assault on our country will continue to pass for real news, and our ability to understand, monitor and adjust our democracy so that it meets the needs of our people will pass right along with it.

UPDATE:  More Rovian delusions

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blogmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • TailRank
  • YahooMyWeb

Comments

Comment from Josh Hammond
Time: December 4, 2007, 1:23 pm

The New York Times did well by the story in its print edition, giving it a big type-face headline, usually reserved for sinking ships.

What surprises me is that the report says what it says. How in the hell did this one get cleared??? It’s a miracle. I’m sure heads will roll. It should give the media pause to question all the “good” stuff coming out of Iraq, except we have Murtha to betray us, rather than the general. It’s unbelieveable, but Iraq is the only good story Bush has: Afganistan is going to hell; Iran has been cleared; and the North Koreans are taking us to the cleaners.

Comment from Pat
Time: December 5, 2007, 10:09 am

Josh
Maybe the American media isn’t questioning “all the ‘good’ stuff coming out of Iraq,” but at least one paper from the UK is. According to The Guardian, “Iraq’s main Sunni resistance groups have scaled back their attacks on US forces in Baghdad and parts of Anbar province in a deliberate strategy aimed at regrouping, retraining, and waiting out George Bush’s “surge.” A key insurgent leader has told The Guardian.”

They also wrote that one of the reasons for the decrease in violence in Iraq was because of “the decision by dozens of Sunni tribal leaders to accept money and weapons from the Americans in return for confronting Al Qaida militants who attack civilians. They call their movement al Sahwa (the Awakening)”

The Guardian goes on to quote the key insurgent leader as saying that this “was a ‘temporary deal’ with the US and would split apart as people realised the American true intentions.”

That’s just what we need, a few more pissed off Sunni’s armed wih shiny-new American weapons.

Write a comment