Real Journalists
Real journalists, old journalists, if you will--the kind of guys and gals who work a beat, develop sources, learn their subjects' businesses, bend over backwards to be fair and accurate are--to a disproportionate degree--people of high integrity. Drunks, often, but very honest.
There are thousands of these folks at work at big and little newspapers and wire services and even a few broadcast outlets every day, doing their jobs, making sure the mayor isn't giving all the development contracts to his friends, the local utility isn't gouging, and the local cops aren't beating up every vagrant they arrest. They are, in my experience, the fairest human beings I have ever met and they strive for a level of objectivity that is rare. It is also a fundamental part of journalism training, or at least it was, when I was a pup. Like everyone else they have personal prejudices and dislikes but real journalists place a high premium on being above personal prejudice.
Those people on CNN and NBC and CBS are not journalists and what they do is not journalism. The good hair people are news readers. The bad hair people are aspiring news readers. Brokow, Rather, Jennings are highly paid news readers. They are very smart people and very well-informed and glib but they are not reporters. George Will or Maureen Dowd or William Safire are no longer journalists. They may have been at some time but most columnists are paid to write their "opinions" which are entertaining, perhaps, but you are expected to agree or disagree with them. Their opinion may be better written than yours but yours is just as valid. A handful of columnists do report and do their own legwork: Bob Herbert, for example and Thomas Friedman--but most do not.
Now, there is another category of newsling--the talking head "expert" who probably has no more real knowledge of what's actually happening than the rest of us, but is willing to make a fool of him or herself in public anyway. These people are definitely not journalists and what they say is definitely not news.
Nowadays it is easy to mistake up the legitimate newsgathers and reporters with the bubblegum tv folks. They ain't the same but it's up to us to make the distinction.
There are thousands of these folks at work at big and little newspapers and wire services and even a few broadcast outlets every day, doing their jobs, making sure the mayor isn't giving all the development contracts to his friends, the local utility isn't gouging, and the local cops aren't beating up every vagrant they arrest. They are, in my experience, the fairest human beings I have ever met and they strive for a level of objectivity that is rare. It is also a fundamental part of journalism training, or at least it was, when I was a pup. Like everyone else they have personal prejudices and dislikes but real journalists place a high premium on being above personal prejudice.
Those people on CNN and NBC and CBS are not journalists and what they do is not journalism. The good hair people are news readers. The bad hair people are aspiring news readers. Brokow, Rather, Jennings are highly paid news readers. They are very smart people and very well-informed and glib but they are not reporters. George Will or Maureen Dowd or William Safire are no longer journalists. They may have been at some time but most columnists are paid to write their "opinions" which are entertaining, perhaps, but you are expected to agree or disagree with them. Their opinion may be better written than yours but yours is just as valid. A handful of columnists do report and do their own legwork: Bob Herbert, for example and Thomas Friedman--but most do not.
Now, there is another category of newsling--the talking head "expert" who probably has no more real knowledge of what's actually happening than the rest of us, but is willing to make a fool of him or herself in public anyway. These people are definitely not journalists and what they say is definitely not news.
Nowadays it is easy to mistake up the legitimate newsgathers and reporters with the bubblegum tv folks. They ain't the same but it's up to us to make the distinction.

