|
Best of the Blog
Bloggers
Regular Guests
|
|
Saturday, July 10, 2004
Bushovictim
The president and his inner circle step from the pages of the Senate intelligence committee report absolved from any and all efforts to pressure senior intelligence officers to shape “product” in support of what the Kean Commission concluded was an obsessive White House campaign to build support for unilateralist action in Iraq. Score it Pat Roberts 1, Jay Rockefeller 0.
One glass of non-alcoholic “Blood of the Lamb” cabernet from Hughes-Rove vineyards has our leader morphing into Bushovictim. Enabled by ex-DCI Tenet and his demonized crew into making bad decisions with bad intelliegence. Now drawing sympathy from both sides of the aisle, our Bushovictim has a plan to transform the CIA. More power for Lord Rummy who is eager to reorganize the agency under his aegis. More international responsibilities for the FBI, led by Bushovic family retainer “Dial M” for Mueller. And new (pre-approved by senate Dems) intel czar Armitage who never saw a Vang Pao opium convoy that he didn’t like. All this moving ahead like Rommel driving deep into Egypt ahead of a lame-duck presidency. There will be nothing the Dems can do but inherit the new mess.
So what will the future of US intelligence look like? Get ready for another bumbling, ganglionic Bushovic monster like Homeland Security where outside consultants bleed the taxpayer, drive up collection costs with ever more sophisticated “sources and methods” and make great findings like why you can get onto an airplane carrying four packs of matches but not five.
posted by Groom
6:50 PM
What Ever Happened to Innocent Until Proven...
John Edwards said today:
"You can't save any money because it takes every dime you make to just to pay your bills. And if something goes wrong, a serious illness, or a layoff, you go right off the cliff," he said. "And to make things even worse, millions of Americans have lost their life's savings and pensions because of corporate crooks like Ken Lay." We don't expect Michael Moore to play fair--he's an entertainer--but candidates for office should be held to a higher standard...even if they're on our team.
posted by Jerry Bowles
5:01 PM
Lovable Furry Creatures
Happy second anniversary to Skippy the Bush Kangeroo. You're a marsupial after our own heart.
posted by Jerry Bowles
4:51 PM
In his gut, he knows he's right
A letter from Iraq found on Hackworth concludes,
So after my diatribe, yes I like the President, and it will kill me to vote for the other guy, but our President is accepting the advice of senior officials who are leading us on a dangerous path that frankly scares me to death. Repugs counting on the military vote may be in for a nasty surprise.
posted by John
9:48 AM
Will Sen. Kerry support Reagan-thug Armitage to run CIA?
The morning of September 11, 2001, Rep. Porter Goss (R-FL) and Sen. Bob Graham (D-FL) were having breakfast with Pakistan intelligence chief Gen. Mahoud Ahmad, the man the Bushovic FBI says is the "money man" behind the 9/11 operation. Once considered the Bushovic choice to run and "reform" the CIA, the former case officer's number has been taken down. The New York Times is reporting this day that the Senate is favoably disposed to approving the new Bushovic choice, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. If Bushovic channeled Ronald Reagan, Bill Casey, Cap Weinberger and Eliot Abrams into the ideal "Manchurian Candidate" to be DCI, it would be terror-monger Armitage. He has so much black baggage he'll need Air America to haul it. If the Dems win the White House in a "landslide" Armitage would be a lame-duck appointment on Kerry's watch. Any bets on whether the presumptive candidate will show up to vote- for or against- the Armitage nomination?
posted by Groom
9:35 AM
Today's Most Important Quote*
"Tragically, the intelligence failures set forth in this report will affect our national security for generations to come. Our credibility is diminished. Our standing in the world has never been lower. We have fostered a deep hatred of Americans in the Muslim world, and that will grow. As a direct consequence, our nation is more vulnerable today than ever before," said Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., the panel's top-ranking Democrat .
Shall we pause to remember which of the major candidates in last year's primaries recognized clearly how dubious the evidence was before the decision to go to war was made. Dare we say that if the Kerry administration fails to find a very high place, indeed, for Howard Dean, it will be a major disservice to a nation now more than ever in need of the Doctor's sharp, no bullshit judgment.
*Found at Myrtle Beach. com.
posted by John
12:19 AM
Friday, July 09, 2004
Light Reading
For those of you who are dying to read the Senate Intelligence Committee's Iraq report, you can find it here, all 521 pages of it (pdf format). Hey, it's shorter and more exciting than Bill's eight-pound bestseller. And it's free.
posted by Jerry Bowles
10:36 PM
Single barista theory...
For those who want him off the ticket... Lord Cheney is frequently photographed holding a Starbucks cup while getting into a big SUV. From the land of beer and brats, the Milwaukee Journal (reg. reqd.) reminds us that some of those coffee drinks are a liquid heart attack, not on a plate. What is the Dickster's favorite Java Jive? Only his barista knows for sure. Or for the right price maybe Mary Matalin will blab it on a Sunday morning talk show.
posted by Groom
6:22 PM
My Prediction: Kerry Wins In Dem Landslide!
I know there're a lot of folks worried about November, and the possibility of Bush getting another four years to Cheney things up even worse, but I'm going out on a limb here to say that I'm beginning to feel quite optimistic about our prospects. Why? Stories like this, and this, and this.
Polltakers don't seem to be asking the right question, not "Will you [a self-identified Republican or Independent] vote for Kerry?" but "Will you vote for BUSH?" I envision a lot of disillusioned goopers simply staying home come Election Day.
Another way to look at it is, Gore beat Bush in the popular vote by a margin of over 544,000 (situated in the wrong places in relation to state boundaries, unfortunately). Now, how many people have you run into or read about in the past four years who say, "My gosh! I voted for Gore in 2000, but I won't make THAT mistake again! I'm voting for BUSH this time!" Let's have a show of hands: Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?
Now, how many people have you known or read about who say just the opposite -- that they voted for Bush, but that they "won't get fooled again?" I'd say at least a handful of "converts" emerge every few minutes from every movie theater in this country showing Fahrenheit 9/11, which means several dozen new Democratic voters are created every hour (thank you, Michael Moore!).
Let's put it this way: If we actually have a valid election come November -- one in which Diebold machines and Our Robed Betters aren't allowed to run interference for the GOP -- we're looking at 1932 redux. Happy Days Are Here Again!
posted by Michael
4:17 PM
Thinking the Unthinkable
Suppose George Bush is re-elected in November? What can we expect from a second Bush term?
On the foreign policy front, I wouldn't expect much. The Iraq war is now in a suspended mode until after the election but certain to return in full vengeance by early next year as we finally confront the unfinished Fallujah and al Sadr business. (The rebel Sunnis are not taking a time out for the elections but our troops have gone into the famous Texas half-Armadillo mode to lower casualties and lure swing voters into thinking things are getting better.)
The Iraq mess is going to take years to clean up and make the electorate increasingly unhappy--if Shrub wins he will leave office as the most unpopular president ever.
Our traditional allies are going to remain grumpy and suspicious and unhelpful. The Iranians are going to go nuclear and there is nothing we can do about it because our military is dangerously overstretched and everyone knows it. That's why after near four years of pissing on the North Koreans, Condi is now trying to cut a deal. The only positive is that four more years probably means no more wars. We don't have the resources.
On the domestic front, Shrub's power to create mischief remains at a dangerous level. There will be Supreme Court appointments in the next four years. Real science will continue to take a beating. Rich people will get new tax cuts.
But, I've depressed myself enough. What do you folks think?
posted by Jerry Bowles
2:51 PM
Landslide?
Knight-Ridder has a story today about the Pew Research Center's latest study which shows that Americans are paying far more attention to the coming election than they normally do. The nugget is this: Although polls consistently show voters almost evenly split between President Bush and Kerry, Kohut (Andrew Kohut, the director of the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press) questioned the conventional wisdom that this year's election will be an extremely close contest. He estimated that about 15 percent of voters could go either way on Election Day.
"There are still enough of those swing voters for one of these two presidential candidates to win big," he said.
posted by Jerry Bowles
9:51 AM
Paging Rosemary Woods
Guess whose complete military service records were "inadvertently" destroyed, according to the Pentagon?

posted by Jerry Bowles
7:27 AM
Thursday, July 08, 2004
Unfair and Unbalanced
If you feel like laughing your ass off, check out Republican Press. It's not what you think.
posted by Jerry Bowles
8:32 PM
Bring out the bobbleheads, por favor
In the anything goes world of California politics Marta y Leo are giving Arnold und Maria a run for their money. Why aren't the Dems looking at Frau Frist, Josh Hastert, Chet Lott? Or looking at the great job that Wendy Gramm says she did on the Enron "audit committee"? Maybe because Tom and Linda Daschle near the top of the lobbyist-legislator food chain and there's plenty of Dem nepotism to go around.
posted by Groom
3:25 PM
But, The New York Post Had it First
From today's Houston Chronicle:
An editorial in Wednesday's Chronicle carelessly referred to Sen. John Kerry in one reference as "President Kerry." The Chronicle regrets the error.
posted by Jerry Bowles
1:46 PM
PR-Public Relations or Pissed Reporters?
One thing that drives me nuts about the current state of affairs here in the U.S. is that of all things, we seem to be losing the "PR war" with the terrorists and other bad guys. For a country that has done so much good for the world to not be able to get positive press is ridiculous. Then we go and do this.
Just five months before American voters decide who will be appointed to the most powerful office in the world, the US state department said it would no longer allow overseas journalists to renew visas from within the country.
From next week the estimated 20,000 foreign journalists stationed in the US, who used to be able to renew their visas with ease in any major city, will be forced to leave the country to do so.
Rather than applying to renew their visas in Washington or New York, they will be forced to leave the country and re-apply at a US embassy or consulate abroad, delaying their application for between four weeks and six months Andrew Sullivan tells what he's heard from reporter friends:
It's already a nightmare to enter this country, because of the new security regulations. British journalists have been jailed, humiliated and deported for the most minor of details, immigration officials at the borders now have powers that defy judicial review and act accordingly. Many of my European friends tell me that they simply won't visit the U.S. any more because of the experience of entering what appears to be a police state at the border - and the risk of summary arrest for no good reason. This is bad enough when it affects millions of ordinary people - tourists, business-people (I've noticed a big decline in European tourists on the Cape this summer). But when you target the group that is responsible for conveying what the United States is to the rest of the world, you are only hurting yourself. Isn't it embarrasing when the United States starts sounding like North Korea?
Brian Rodgers
posted by FPN
1:01 PM
Showtime for Kenny Boy
With his sealed indictment now open former Enron chairman Ken Lay has a tad less de facto executive privilege than he did last week. This party would have started a lot earlier if vice chairman Cliff Baxter hadn’t self-suicided in his car (a single bullet to the head) when the scandal first broke. Jeez, wasn’t that right about the same time that Obersturmbannfuehrer Karl Rove dumped his Enron shares. Which of the Bushovic retainers got called in to clean up Kenny’s mess? You guessed it… the good guys and gals at Baker Botts where they see the world according to Texas. As we approach a presidential election the probable result of which will be that the only change is regime change, average Americans who struggle to pay their electricity bills and gas credit cards are watching on the sidelines as a legal process of greater magnitude than Watergate is devolving into little more than a Star Chamber proceeding. Wouldn’t it be a pleasant surprise if, somehow, Kerry and Edwards show some cojones and use the octopus that is Enron to their advantage.
posted by Groom
11:15 AM
John Edwards, Pretty Face, Policy Wonk
During the Democratic primaries, John Edwards advanced most of the best policy positions of any of the candidates. His ideas tended to get lost in the born-in-a-mill-town and populist "two Americas" schtick but they displayed an uncommon thoughtfulness about big issues. For example, the Carnegie Endownment for International Peace said his detailed strategy to combat proliferation was "the most comprehensive and far-reaching of the three proposals" advanced by the candidates. In it, he called for a new "Global Compact" to heighten security for existing nuclear facilities and material, toughen international inspections, limit production of nuclear bomb materials and nuclear fuel, and authorize strong, immediate punishment for any nation that violates and then quits the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. He said his plan would "close the loophole that allows civilian nuclear programs to go military." He also promised to triple funding for Nunn-Lugar programs to secure and eliminate nuclear weapons and materials in Russia and to expand the security program to other states.
Even before he selected Edwards as his running mate, Kerry had selected parts of Edwards' plan for inclusion in his own strategy announced on June 1, including toughening inspections, capping production of nuclear weapon material and punishing treaty violators. Edwards' policy ideas were sound and sensible before he was picked as the vice presidential candidate. He clearly planned ahead knowing that his short resume was his biggest liability. That will help when the GOP tries to paint him as all style and no substance.
posted by Jerry Bowles
10:14 AM
Zinger
The following is the conclusion to a UPI editorial by Martin Walker.
Many foreign diplomats in Washington have already sent cables home warning their governments that there will not be any great change in policy if the Kerry-Edwards ticket prevails in November. But Edwards, who emerges from a study of his policy positions as a thoughtful and optimistic internationalist, would be the most persuasive salesman for U.S. foreign policy since the world sadly learned to stop taking Secretary of State Colin Powell seriously as the global voice of the Bush administration.
posted by John
8:50 AM
Bye Bye Vice
Back in November, on these pages, I said that Bush would dump Cheney, and in my recent post about "Why Bush Wins," I reiterated the same prediction. Yesterday Chris Matthews on Hardball raised the issue in his interview with Senator Trent Lott and even former heavyweight New York Senator D’Amato has publicly called for Colin Powell or John McCain to replace the GFY Dickster as a "guarantee" for Bush’s re-election.
While Bush is stupidly loyal—-witness Rummy’s continued reign of incompetence at Defense—-he does not want to continue a family tradition of being a one-term president. He’ll do anything to get re-elected. And dumping Vice gets rid of a lot of baggage and enables him to start “fresh,” with Halliburton, secret energy meetings and other Cheneyisms moot. Bush would then run “as his own guy.”
Going up against either Powell or McCain in a debate would definitely show up Edwards inexperience. It’s not going to be Powell, but 68-year-old McCain has nothing to lose, and being VP would be a nice way to cap his career, giving him a long shot at the presidency in 2008.
Some of us wanted McCain as VP--now we might just get him.
posted by Josh
7:25 AM
Bi-partisanship at work
So you think that "bi-partisanship" is dead? As the Senate Intelligence Committee releases the first phase of its report on US intelligence “failures” connected with 9/11 and the War of Lies in Iraq it’s comforting for the New York Times to remind us that the Democrats earlier this year agreed to a deal with the GOP assuring that the Bush administration’s role in propagating this intelligence clusterfuck will not be examined until after the November presidential vote. Taking this issue away from the Dems is like giving Bushovic a free pit stop in a NASCAR race. If turnabout is fair play Democratic lawmakers ought to think about blocking the probable White House appointment of Rep. Porter Goss (R-Fl) as director of Central Intelligence. The last thing a victorious John Kerry needs is to inherit a lame duck DCI with heavy Bushovic baggage.
posted by Groom
6:39 AM
Wednesday, July 07, 2004
Dog Fight
Amusing to watch the GOP spinsters pretending to relish unleashing their "experienced" pit bull, Dick Cheney, on the callow pup, John Edwards. Some of them may actually believe it but there has to be growing concern among the faithful that maybe the Vice has used the "growl and snarl" tactic a little too often. Just yesterday the 9/11 Commission called his bluff on the comment that he "probably" knew things they didn't. In fact, almost everything Cheney has said since coming to office has turned out to be an exaggeration or an outright lie.
Cheney's "core competency," as they say in Peter Druckerland, has always been his status as an insider with access to information that others don't have and his willingness to peddle that information to win friends, destroy enemies and influence events. That's why he hates the idea of transparency. There is no principle involved; to an incompetent political hack like Cheney insider information is power and the preferred currency of cronyism--the only true "ism" to your end-of-the-bolt military-industrialist.
If, as in the case of those "reconstituted" Iraqi nuclear programs or Saddam's "ties" to al Queda or those cheering throngs welcoming U.S. troops as "liberators," the insider information turns out to be questionable you can just insist you were right or never said it and if you do it loudly and often and obnoxiously enough some people will believe you.
Or will they?
Future historians will almost certainly find that Dick Cheney was George Bush's Rasputin, the true evil force behind the throne. He is certain to be regarded by dispassionate students of history as the most deranged, dangerous and self-deluded idealogue ever to hold the office of vice president in our fair republic.
But, of course, we don't have time for history; the world may not survive another four years of Bush-Cheney. That's why job number one for John Edwards has got to be to reveal Cheney as the toothless old fraudster that he is. I can't wait. In image-is-everything America this dog fight is quickly going to become a cute puppy contest and our adorable little guy is going to kick ass.
posted by Jerry Bowles
4:20 PM
Martial Powers Law in Iraq Is Necessary At This Point
So the new Iraqi government is instituting a martial-powers law giving Prime Minister Allawi the authority to do pretty much whatever he thinks he needs to do to establish security in the country.
I know there's a lot of hand-wringing about this, but I say: Power to him. The country will never get on its feet without improved security. Never. And at this point, even a couple hundred thousand more troops probably couldn't do the job.
The absolute best thing the new Iraqi government could do to help the country is do what the Americans haven't been able to do: establish security. If this law is what it takes to make a realistic attempt to establish security, bring it on.
posted by Vicki
12:16 PM
Boy, This Guy is Good
During the long process that led up to Kerry's choice of Edwards, it must have occurred to someone to ask the standard, "if you get this job, what do you intend to do," question and there is no doubt that Edwards must have responded with something along the lines of "I will help the average, red state, undecided voter understand who John Kerry is."
From their joint appearance this morning: "I grew up in a small town in North Carolina," Edwards added. "This is the kind of man we grew up lucky enough to respect — somebody who believed in faith, and family and responsibility, and having everybody get a chance to do what they're capable of doing, not just a few."
Eureka! Kerry is the guy we may not have been able to have a beer with, but that's a good thing! He's the class president, the captain of the football team, the altar boy, the scholaship winner who did not become a party hound (like Bush) or a pussy hound (like Clinton). He's not like us, and that's ok!
posted by Evelyn
12:05 PM
Tooth fairy economics
More Hitler-in-the-bunker propaganda in support of Bushovic. After running their "top 10" rolodex of economic analysts, AP is reporting that US economic growth- measured by Gross Domestic Product (GDP)- will surpass not only the high growth rates of the Clinton administration but those of the Reagan administration as well. Time for the AFL-CIO's Committee on Political Education (COPE) to get out the truth squad on this one.
posted by Groom
11:08 AM
Something Completely Different
Those of you who need a break from politics as usual might check out the new personal, non-political blog I just started. It's called Postcards from a Life. I'll be posting some geriatric ramblings there from time to time. I hope you enjoy them.
posted by Jerry Bowles
10:23 AM
Second Thoughts on a “Bad Choice”
The comments on my entry yesterday about Edwards being a bad choice prompted some good exchange, including this clincher from Genevieve: “Bottom-line, it doesn't matter what Edwards brings to the table after the election, if we can't get our guy to the table. Edwards offers the tilt towards the common folk that the two Yalies can't. His style is engaging and upbeat to counter the grim countenance of Kerry. He has optimism about America (something I feel strained to maintain) and a way of making it feel contagious. It's all theatre anyway. I'd rather take my chances with Edwards on stage after that fatally-missed heartbeat than the soulless puppet up there now.”
Jeffer made much the same point. So I have changed my mind. The case for me is now further strengthened by two additional pieces of data that I did not have yesterday. One, 75 percent of the undecided voters do NOT have a college education and while this is a traditionally good demographic for Democrats, most of these undecided voters are in Red States and will vote value issues rather than pocketbook issues as defined in Thomas Frank’s book, What’s The Matter With Kansas, not a traditional winning dynamic for Democrats. Two, in the open primary states, Edwards beat out Kerry and others to win the Independent vote and the youth vote—both critical to a November win.
So if Edwards can appeal to the jury of high school graduates who tend to vote values over the economic issues that would benefit them more, we have a winning ticket on our hands. Count me in.
posted by Josh
7:26 AM
From $200 billion liar to $200 billion lobbyist
Thomas A. Scully isn’t a household name to the retirees at Century Village or up in Parkchester. But if you are one of the 30 million plus getting fucked over by the Bushovic “prescription drug benefit” you might want to buy a few new pins for your voodoo doll. Working under cheesehead Tommy Thomson at Health & Human Services, Scully was the administrator of Medicare. Thomson, at the behest of the White House, took part in a smoke and mirrors campaign to deceive lawmakers and citizens about the huge costs of the Medicare drug "benefit" and its lack of competitive pricing.
Scully, for his part, helped write the Medicare law and withheld information from Congress. An internal investigation reveals that he threatened co-workers if they would not cooperate with him to misrepresent the cost of the program to Congress and the American people. The New York Times reports that nothing Scully did, including his $200 billion lie, appears to be illegal and, furthermore, that he is raking in the bucks as a Beltway lobbyist for the same drug companies the laws he helped write were designed to benefit. Let's hope this develops into a big fat Greek campaign issue.
posted by Groom
5:51 AM
Tuesday, July 06, 2004
What makes Edwards a good choice for John Kerry?
The Carpetbagger has ten great reasons.
posted by John
11:31 PM
There are two things I like a lot about John Kerry's letter
Having signed up at the Kerry website, I was one of the million or so folks who got John Kerry's e-mail announcing his choice of John Edwards as his running mate. The letter impressed me. When I asked myself why, I found two reasons.
The first is the acknowledgment that "You are the heart and soul of our campaign." This pleases me immensely because it picks up the "You have the power" theme that attracted me so strongly to the Howard Dean campaign. But it pleases me even more because it speaks so directly to what we in Democrats Abroad are all about, getting individual American citizens to realize that we are, indeed, the heart and soul of democracy. It is our votes, our activism, and our constant critical involvement with what our leaders say and do that make democracy possible.
The second are the themes announced in Kerry's description of Edwards, "He has shown courage and conviction as a champion for middle class Americans and those struggling to reach the middle class." This speaks to my own conviction that humane, civilized, democratic societies--the kind in which I like to live--require a strong middle class and opportunities for everyone to join or rise above it.
To me, being a Democrat is, above all, about being a pragmatist--not the narrow-minded sort whose instrumental reasoning is only a tool for greed, but the generous pragmatist described by Richard Rorty, "What matters for pragmatists is divising ways of diminishing human suffering and increasing human equality, increasing the ability of all human children to start life with an equal chance of happiness."
Those are, indeed, goals worth fighting for, goals which I believe John Kerry and John Edwards share, and the Bushes, Cheneys, Rumsfelds, Tom Delays and John Ashcrofts do not.
Kerry and Edwards are now our champions. But the causes they champion belong to all of us. We are, indeed, the heart and soul of this campaign, and their victory isn't up to them. It's up to us.
Kerry/Edwards 2004!
P.S. Don't miss Arianna Huffington's take on the choice of Edwards on DFA.com.
posted by John
10:12 PM
Cheney drops the soap
Disputing Lord Go-Fuck-Yourself, the Kissinger... oops, Kean Commission investigating 9/11 issued a statement today indicating that Al-Qaida had only limited contact with Iraq. They based their finding on access to the same information Cheney used to fabricate the Saddam-Osama myth.
| |