Best of the Blog
Bloggers 
Jerry Bowles

Groom Lake
John McCreery
Josh Hammond
Evelyn Keyes
Michael Scott
Jeff Popovich
Leftcoast

Regular Guests


J.A. Bartlett
Vicki Meagher

Top Blogs

The Agonist
Roger Ailes
Alas, A Blog
Eric Alterman
Atrios' Eschaton
Bartcop
Tim Blair
Body & Soul
Blogging of President Busy Busy Busy
Juan Cole/Informed Comment
DailyKos
The Decembrist
Brad DeLong
Kevin Drum/Political Animal
Electrolite
Freeway Blogger
George Must Go
InstaPundit.com
Intel Dump
Liberal Oasis
Josh Marshall
My DD
My Way of Thinking
New Republic's &C.
Nathan Newman
100 Monkeys Typing
Opinion Journal
Orcinus
Oxblog
PLA
Virginia Postrel
Rittenhouse Review
Andrew Sullivan
Suburban Guerilla
Talk Left
Tapped
Truthout
Unqualified Offerings
Upper Left
Volokh Conspiracy
WarBlogging
Wonkette

And Don't Forget Jerry's Other Blog
Postcards from a Life


 
 



Blogger Stuff 
Blogger

Blogcritics.org
Blogdex
Daypop Top 40



Indispensible
BoingBoing

Cursor
Foreign Policy in Focus
Neal Pollack
MetaFilter
Plastic
ScrappleFace
Tom Tomorrow


Paranoia
Alertnet
American Prowler
Capitol Hill Blue
Disinformation
GlobalSecurity.org
Janes.com
JudicialWatch
National Security Archive
Open Secrets
Responding First
to Bioterrorism
Stratfor


Opinion & Analysis
American Prospect
Center Public Integrity
Foreign Affairs Online
Foreign Policy
Progressive Populist
The Nation
Moving Ideas
National Review
TomPaine.commonsense
Policy Review
Public Agenda Online
 
 

Archives

 


powered by FreeFind


 
 


 
 
 
 

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Saturday, January 03, 2004
Strom and Gay Marriage

To Jerry’s predictions, I would add that the major subcutaneous issue of 2004 will not be Iraq or jobs but “gay marriage.”

More on that in a moment, but my new year’s wish is that every time a right-wing holier-than-thou is seen spouting off this year there will be – like an unwanted “pop-up” – side-by-sides of Strom and his unacknowledged daughter, Essie Mae Washington-Williams. By the way, for those who still yearn for more, The Washington Post, which of course broke the story, has the best opinion and coverage that I found in print. Although for sheer historical appeal, look at the Minneapolis Star Tribune for a trip down the two-faced “black top.”

The Wilmington Journal reported December 22 that Strom and his family were related several ways to “black” Thurmonds whom they would not have allowed in the front door. The Wilmington Journal is one of those old Southern segregation-era papers that existed because of the dual society that Thurmond and others, from Theodore Bilbo of Mississippi (he of the red suspenders) to Mills Godwin in Virginia (he of the well modulated vowels and Massive Resistance to de-segregation) worked so hard to protect. The Thurmonds were all laboring to maintain a system that had a lie at its core, protecting their droit du seigneur while espousing racial separation.

Julian Bond, quoted in another black paper, says "It is a story, most of all, of great personal hypocrisy," Bond said. "How a man can preach racial separatism and practice interracial sex, in defiance of the then-current laws of his state and defiance of his entire public life. You wonder if Strom Thurmond and others like him ever had any convictions about anything at all."

Strom never publicly recanted his segregationist past, either, to the extent that Wallace or Byrd of West Virginia did. After the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act it became expedient to change the tune, but not to repudiate the past. This is not denial or thoughtless hypocrisy, friends, this is a strategy.

In other words, the upholders of desegregation knew perfectly well that they were creating one code for themselves and one for others and that was the point. They used fear of miscegenation because it worked for them at the polls, and when it no longer did, they dropped it without much of a pause or a pang. All along, Strom on a personal level was probably a gracious guy to black folk, who were after all, “kin,” so it never occurred to him that he was doing anything more than what it took to remain in power.

So where does that leave us in the contemporary political scene, beyond the racial issues that still dog us, from stars-and-bars mania to whether or not Howard Dean can get one white Southerner to vote for him? What other droit du seigneurs is the current administration fighting to protect at the same time that they are denying it to everyone else?

Well. Look no further than the new reason to keep your children locked up: gay marriage. Yes, the GOP rabble will rouse, it could happen to you if you let Dean and his kind into the White House. Race baiting will be replaced by gay bashing, because it resonates in exactly the same nether regions with voters. It’s as irrational as the fear that your white daughter would be tempted by the little black boy down the street. But it all boils down to the same fear: that given enough freedom, those that you are keeping in their places might do to you what you have been doing to them.

So for Karl Rove (where is his Essie Mae?) there is no better candidate than the guy who signed Vermont’s civil union legislation. If I were gay in this country I would be mortgaging my house right now to contribute to Dean’s campaign, or to fund investigations into the sexual proclivities of every top-ranked family valueist around. Who knows how many lives and years of neglect would have been saved if Ms. Washington-Williams had come forward in 1948 instead of 2004?